Re: [pgsql-advocacy] What do we need for new PUGs?

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)infinito(dot)it>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] What do we need for new PUGs?
Date: 2015-03-04 19:25:28
Message-ID: 20150304192528.GK29780@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

* Bruce Momjian (bruce(at)momjian(dot)us) wrote:
> This points out a real reason for per-language, if not per-PUG) lists
> --- you can't just say posting to pgsql-general is good for non-English
> speakers.

Uh, we already provide per-language lists:

http://www.postgresql.org/list/group/4/

Most of those at least had activity in the past year, which is not the
case for the PUG lists.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-03-04 19:29:45 Re: What do we need for new PUGs?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2015-03-04 19:20:41 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] What do we need for new PUGs?

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-03-04 19:29:45 Re: What do we need for new PUGs?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2015-03-04 19:20:41 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] What do we need for new PUGs?