| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: moving from contrib to bin |
| Date: | 2015-01-18 13:13:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20150118131342.GE11664@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2015-01-18 12:56:59 +0000, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but is it not the case that:
> 1) pg_standby was intended to be customizable code, even if usable as
> distributed, and
I don't think that really happened in reality though...
> 2) in any event it is essentially deprecated in favour of standby_mode
Right.
> and therefore moving it to src/bin seems like a wrong move on two counts?
I personally agree that that pg_standby shouldn't be moved. Even if we
could not find agreement to remove it, there's little reason to move it
imo. My reading of the previous discussion was that we're far from alone
with that position. That's why I'd like to have the patchseries in a
way that individual moves can be applied separately.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-01-18 13:16:40 | Re: moving from contrib to bin |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-01-18 13:02:13 | Re: moving from contrib to bin |