From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | jochen(at)pgfarm(dot)erwied(dot)eu, chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | New Python vs. old PG on raccoon and jaguarundi |
Date: | 2014-12-20 07:22:03 |
Message-ID: | 20141220072203.GD1838835@tornado.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
PostgreSQL 9.2 and later support Python 3.3 and Python 3.4; PostgreSQL 9.1 and
9.0 do not. Buildfarm member raccoon upgraded from Python 2.7 to Python 3.3
for its 2013-08-18 run, and it has failed for REL9_1_STABLE and REL9_0_STABLE
ever since. Please omit --with-python for those branches. (Pointing to an
older Python is also an option.) Incidentally, raccoon REL9_4_STABLE has
jammed for some time on a stale git lock file. As best I recall, you can just
remove /usr/src/pgfarm/build/REL9_4_STABLE/pgsql and let the buildfarm client
re-clone it.
Buildfarm member jaguarundi, which has Python 3.4, activated --with-python for
REL9_1_STABLE as of its 2014-12-15 run. Please remove --with-python or test
against an older Python. It already omits --with-python for REL9_0_STABLE.
Thanks,
nm
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christian Ullrich | 2014-12-20 08:06:13 | Re: New Python vs. old PG on raccoon and jaguarundi |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2014-12-20 06:39:23 | Initdb-cs_CZ.WIN-1250 buildfarm failures |