| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New timezones used in regression tests |
| Date: | 2014-05-15 19:17:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20140515191741.GJ25053@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:47:21PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 07:16:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I agree, that seems an entirely gratuitous choice of zone. It does
> >> seem like a good idea to test a zone that has a nonintegral offset
> >> from GMT, but we can get that from almost anywhere as long as we're
> >> testing a pre-1900 date. There's no need to use any zones that aren't
> >> long-established and unlikely to change.
>
> > If we want a nonintegral offset, why are we not using 'Asia/Calcutta',
> > which is +5:30 from UTC?
>
> I believe there's already one of those tests that considers a zone like
> that. No, I meant a really odd offset, like Paris' +0:09:21 before they
> adopted standardized time.
Wow, OK, got it.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-05-15 19:30:53 | Re: Logical replication woes |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-05-15 19:12:15 | autovacuum scheduling starvation and frenzy |