| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tan Tran <tankimtran(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes |
| Date: | 2014-04-30 19:57:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20140430195750.GA6018@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-students |
Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Greg Stark (stark(at)mit(dot)edu) wrote:
> > I could do the legwork on either the GUC or moving hash indexes to an
> > extension if there's a consensus. But I suspect either will be quite
> > controversial...
> If you'd like to build an extension which provides hash indexes- I say
> go for it? Nothing stopping you as far as that's concerned.
Extensions can't write/replay WAL, so it's not clear to me how would this
work.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-04-30 20:05:56 | Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-04-30 19:46:40 | Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-04-30 20:05:56 | Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-04-30 19:46:40 | Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-04-30 20:05:56 | Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-04-30 19:46:40 | Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes |