From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Reply-To: |
Date: | 2014-03-21 17:49:42 |
Message-ID: | 20140321174942.GA3969106@tornado.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 04:11:12PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 21 March 2014 03:45, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 11:14:30AM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Thanks for the review. I'll respond to each point on a later email but
> looks nothing much major, apart from the point raised on separate
> thread.
Yep.
> >> + * Be careful to ensure this function is called for Tables and Indexes only.
> >> + * It is not currently safe to be called for Views because security_barrier
> >> + * is listed as an option and so would be allowed to be set at a level lower
> >> + * than AccessExclusiveLock, which would not be correct.
> >
> > This statement is accepted and takes only ShareUpdateExclusiveLock:
> >
> > alter table information_schema.triggers set (security_barrier = true);
>
> I find it hard to justify why we accept such a statement. Surely its a
> bug when the named table turns out to be a view? Presumably ALTER
> SEQUENCE and ALTER <other stuff> has checks for the correct object
> type? OMG.
We've framed ALTER TABLE's relkind leniency as a historic artifact. As a move
toward stricter checks, ALTER TABLE refused to operate on foreign tables in
9.1 and 9.2. 9.3 reversed that course, though. For better or worse, ALTER
TABLE is nearly a union of the relation ALTER possibilities. That choice is
well-entrenched.
--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-03-21 18:22:31 | [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-03-21 17:49:29 | Re: pg_archivecleanup bug |