Re: Per table autovacuum vacuum cost limit behaviour strange

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Per table autovacuum vacuum cost limit behaviour strange
Date: 2014-02-14 05:16:39
Message-ID: 20140214051639.GZ6342@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I hadn't noticed this thread. I will give this a look. Thanks for
providing a patch.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haribabu Kommi 2014-02-14 05:21:24 Re: contrib/cache_scan (Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan?)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-02-14 03:50:33 Re: HBA files w/include support?