Re: Suspicion of a compiler bug in clang: using ternary operator in ereport()

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Jason Petersen <jason(at)citusdata(dot)com>, Christian Kruse <christian(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suspicion of a compiler bug in clang: using ternary operator in ereport()
Date: 2014-01-28 23:23:36
Message-ID: 20140128232335.GA10723@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> > Well, we already have Coverity reports and the VIVA64 stuff posted last
> > month. Did they not see these problems? Maybe they did, maybe not, but
> > since there's a large number of false positives it's hard to tell. I
> > don't know how many false positives we would get from a Splint run, but
> > my guess is that it'll be a lot.
>
> I've whittled down most of the false positives and gone through just
> about all of the rest.

Really? Excellent, thanks. I haven't looked at it in quite a while
apparently ...

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2014-01-29 00:43:52 Re: Changeset Extraction v7.3
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2014-01-28 23:20:04 Re: drop duplicate buffers in OS