Re: branching for 9.2devel

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: branching for 9.2devel
Date: 2011-04-25 20:28:56
Message-ID: 20137.1303763336@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 04/25/2011 03:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> *Ouch*. Really? It's hard to believe that anyone would consider it
>> remotely usable for more than toy-sized projects, if you have to list
>> all the typedef names on the command line.

> Looks like BSD does the same. It's just that we hide it in pgindent:

Oh wow, I never noticed that. That's going to be a severe problem for
the "run it anywhere" goal. The typedefs list is already close to 32K,
and is not going anywhere but up. There are already platforms on which
a shell command line that long will fail, and I think once we break past
32K we might find it failing on even pretty popular ones.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Singer 2011-04-25 20:29:04 Re: branching for 9.2devel
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-04-25 20:22:41 pgsql: Fix pg_size_pretty() to avoid overflow for inputs close to INT64