Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs
Date: 2013-12-06 03:34:08
Message-ID: 20131206033407.GH17272@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> > Two naming proposals, "ROWS FROM" and "TABLE FROM", got an ACK from more than
> > one person apiece. I move that we settle on "ROWS FROM".
>
> I'm not sufficiently annoyed by "ROWS FROM" to object. Other opinions?

Works well enough for me.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-12-06 03:37:30 Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-12-06 03:25:53 Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs