Re: removing old ports and architectures

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: removing old ports and architectures
Date: 2013-10-16 18:14:12
Message-ID: 20131016181412.GM5319@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-10-16 13:04:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > - m86k (doesn't have a useable CAS on later iterations like coldfire)
>
> I don't think we can desupport it just because it doesn't have CAS.

Btw, if necessary we could easily support the pre coldfire
variants. Note that e.g. debian doesn't support coldfire either. Well,
the unofficial m68k port after it has been dropped from core debian in
*2007*.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-10-16 18:17:11 Re: [SQL] Comparison semantics of CHAR data type
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-10-16 18:02:51 Re: removing old ports and architectures