Re: drop-index-concurrently-1 on master fails at serializable

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: drop-index-concurrently-1 on master fails at serializable
Date: 2013-10-11 20:12:58
Message-ID: 20131011201258.GA3974671@alap2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-10-08 15:01:26 -0700, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > [ isolation test failed at snapshot-based isolation levels ]
>
> Fix pushed, that looks for the right results based on isolation level.

Hm, given what we're trying to test here, wouldn't it be better to
explicitly use READ COMMITTED?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-10-11 20:23:07 Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-10-11 20:11:51 Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem