Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: amutu(at)amutu(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour
Date: 2013-08-13 03:31:38
Message-ID: 20130813033138.GH12510@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:19:30PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Attached are docs that add the new syntax, and mention it is
> non-standard; you can see the output here:
>
> http://momjian.us/tmp/pgsql/functions-string.html#FUNCTIONS-STRING-SQL
>
> We do document three syntaxes for substring() in the same table, one row
> for each, so there is precedent for doing this.

Attached is an updated patch with a proper example. I could move the
extra syntax into the description of the existing trim entry instead.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
trim.diff text/x-diff 1.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2013-08-13 04:11:41 Re: Recovery.conf PITR by recovery_target_time
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-08-12 21:19:30 Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2013-08-13 03:47:55 Re: Foreground vacuum and buffer access strategy
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2013-08-13 03:16:59 Re: Modyfication Sort Merge Join Alghoritm