Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report

On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 02:16:59PM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 03:03:58PM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> > Some suggestions, perhaps just based on my preference for verbosity:
> >
> >
> > <para>
> > Add cache of local locks (Jeff Janes)
> > </para>
> >
> > <para>
> > This speeds lock release at statement completion in transactions
> > that hold many locks; it is particularly useful for pg_dump.
> > </para>
> >
> >
> > I think this is equally important for restoration of dumps, if the
> restoration
> > is run all in one transaction. (Making the dump and restoring it have
> similar
> > locking and unlocking patterns)
>
> Do you have proposed wording? I can't say just dump/restore as it only
> helps with _logical_ dump and _logical_ restore, and we don't have a
> clear word for logical restore, as it could be pg_restore or piped into
> psql. We could do:
>
> that hold many locks; it is particularly useful for pg_dump and
> restore.
>
> but "restore" seems very vague.
>
>
>
> Yeah, I wasn't sure about how to work that either.
>
> "...and the restore of such dumps."?

s/restore/restoring/

I like it. Done.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +