Re: Behaviour of bgworker with SIGHUP

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Behaviour of bgworker with SIGHUP
Date: 2013-04-10 16:39:59
Message-ID: 20130410163958.GP3751@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Guillaume Lelarge wrote:

> worker_spi.naptime is the naptime between two checks.
> worker_spi.total_workers is the number of workers to launch at
> postmaster start time. The first one can change with a sighup, the last
> one obviously needs a restart.

Many thanks. Pushed as
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/e543631f3c162ab5f6020b1d0209e0353ca2229a
along a few other tweaks. I hope the code is more useful as a sample now.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2013-04-10 16:40:12 Re: Inconsistent DB data in Streaming Replication
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-04-10 16:38:57 Re: Problem with background worker