Re: lazy_vacuum_heap()'s removal of HEAPTUPLE_DEAD tuples

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: lazy_vacuum_heap()'s removal of HEAPTUPLE_DEAD tuples
Date: 2013-01-23 03:28:46
Message-ID: 20130123032846.GA3067@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 02:58:32PM -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
> I have a preliminary nit-pick on the big patch. It generates a compiler
> warning:
>
> vacuumlazy.c: In function ?lazy_scan_heap?:
> vacuumlazy.c:445:9: warning: variable ?prev_dead_count? set but not used
> [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

Thanks. That variable can just go away. Since a full review may turn up more
things, I'll hold off on sending a version fixing that alone.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-01-23 03:29:14 Re: Back-branch update releases coming in a couple weeks
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-01-23 03:24:57 Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables