Re: [PATCH 11/14] Introduce wal decoding via catalog timetravel

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] Introduce wal decoding via catalog timetravel
Date: 2012-12-03 14:48:10
Message-ID: 20121203144810.GC5073@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2012-12-03 09:35:55 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
> On 12-12-03 07:42 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >Two things:
> >1) Which exact options are you using for pg_receivellog? Not "-d
> >replication" by any chance?
>
> Yes that is exactly what I'md doing. Using a real database name instead
> makes this go away.

Was using "replication" an accident or do you think it makes sense in
some way?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Singer 2012-12-03 14:56:20 Re: [PATCH 11/14] Introduce wal decoding via catalog timetravel
Previous Message Kohei KaiGai 2012-12-03 14:41:44 Re: [v9.3] OAT_POST_ALTER object access hooks