Re: Proof of concept: auto updatable views [Review of Patch]

On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 11:33:47AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > There are three different WITH CHECK OPTION options:
>
> > WITH CHECK OPTION
> > WITH CASCADED CHECK OPTION
> > WITH LOCAL CHECK OPTION
>
> No, there are four: the fourth case being if you leave off the phrase
> altogether. That's the only case we accept, and it corresponds to the
> patch's behavior, ie, don't worry about it.

Good point. I just wanted to get that out there in the archives, as
it took a bit of cross-referencing, interpreting and contemplation to
come up with something relatively concise.

> > Oh, and I'm guessing at least one well-known financial services
> > company would just love to have these :)
>
> It might be material for a future patch, but it's not happening in
> this iteration.

Right.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate