| From: | "ktm(at)rice(dot)edu" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Deprecating Hash Indexes |
| Date: | 2012-10-15 19:11:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20121015191113.GQ1583@aart.rice.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:46:40AM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I would be in favor of moving them to contrib for 9.4. Assuming that
> > someone can figure out how this interacts with the existing system table
> > opclasses. Them being in /contrib would also put less pressure on the
> > next new hacker who decides to take them on as a feature; they can
> > improve them incrementally without needing to fix 100% of issues in the
> > first go.
>
> Is there anything currently in contrib that defines its own WAL
> records and replay methods? Are there hooks for doing so?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff
>
That is a good point. Please do not move it to contrib if that will make
it even harder/impossible to add WAL support.
Regards,
Ken
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-10-15 19:11:15 | Re: Deprecating Hash Indexes |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-10-15 19:09:23 | Re: Deprecating RULES |