Re: [PATCH 8/8] Introduce wal decoding via catalog timetravel

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] Introduce wal decoding via catalog timetravel
Date: 2012-10-11 01:16:02
Message-ID: 20121011011602.GG11890@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 09:10:48PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > You consider this to be a throw-away function that won't ever be
> > committed. However, I strongly feel that you should move it into
> > /contrib, so that it can serve as a sort of reference implementation
> > for authors of decoder client code, in the same spirit as numerous
> > existing contrib modules (think contrib/spi).
>
> Without prejudice to the rest of this review which looks quite
> well-considered, I'd like to add a particular +1 to this point.

The review was _HUGE_! :-O

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-10-11 01:29:16 Re: change in LOCK behavior
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-10-11 01:11:18 Re: change in LOCK behavior