From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: September 2012 commitfest |
Date: | 2012-10-10 16:17:04 |
Message-ID: | 20121010161704.GD9594@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > The commitfest currently in progress seems to have ground to a halt.
>
> Indeed :-(. I plead guilty as much as anybody else to not making it
> a high priority. But do we even have anyone acting as commitfest
> manager? Periodic nagging seems to be necessary to move things forward.
Yeah. Apparently we don't so this is my first attempt.
> > Patches in "Ready for committer" state:
> > * Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys
> > * Updatable views
> > * plpgsql_check_function
> > * parallel pg_dump
> > * embedded list interface
> > * Move postgresql_fdw_validator into dblink
>
> I have fairly strong opinions about the first three, and will endeavor
> to work on them next.
Excellent, thanks.
> IIRC, the parallel pg_dump one is said to need review by a Windows
> expert, which is not me, so I've not looked at it.
Andrew? Magnus?
> I'm not sure that the embedded list one can honestly be said to be ready
> for commit considering the lack of consensus on it, but we seem to be
> making some progress anyway.
I posted an updated version this morning.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-10-10 16:18:29 | Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-10-10 16:13:07 | Re: Extend argument of OAT_POST_CREATE |