Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Rural Hunter <ruralhunter(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Date: 2012-09-24 12:55:00
Message-ID: 20120924125500.GA21242@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 06:46:33PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 22:20 +0800, Rural Hunter wrote:
> > Ah yes, seems I used a wrong parameter. The --locale='zh_CN.utf8'
> > works. --locale='zh_CN.UTF8' also works. But still the question is,
> > should the encoding name be case sensitive?
>
> PostgreSQL treats encoding names as case insensitive.
>
> But it depends on the operating system whether locale names are case
> sensitive.

I can confirm that pg_upgrade does case-insensitive comparisons of
encoding/locale names:

static void
check_locale_and_encoding(ControlData *oldctrl,
ControlData *newctrl)
{
/* These are often defined with inconsistent case, so use pg_strcasecmp(). */
if (pg_strcasecmp(oldctrl->lc_collate, newctrl->lc_collate) != 0)
pg_log(PG_FATAL,
"old and new cluster lc_collate values do not match\n");
if (pg_strcasecmp(oldctrl->lc_ctype, newctrl->lc_ctype) != 0)
pg_log(PG_FATAL,
"old and new cluster lc_ctype values do not match\n");
if (pg_strcasecmp(oldctrl->encoding, newctrl->encoding) != 0)
pg_log(PG_FATAL,
"old and new cluster encoding values do not match\n");
}

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Johnny Tan 2012-09-24 13:05:11 changes to postgresql.conf
Previous Message John Coryat 2012-09-24 11:50:01 Re: Multiple servers with Postgresql

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-09-24 13:06:04 Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-09-24 11:37:59 Re: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY is not really concurrency safe & leaves around undroppable indexes