Re: contrib translations

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib translations
Date: 2012-09-14 14:13:39
Message-ID: 20120914141339.GA11280@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:59:45AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie sep 14 10:37:18 -0300 2012:
> > Someone asked me about translations for pg_upgrade, and I don't see 'po'
> > directories for any of the contrib tools. Do we not translate contrib
> > stuff? Why?
>
> We don't. I don't know the exact reason, but I know that while perusing
> pg_upgrade's source recently I found several things that will need to be
> changed there in order for it to be decently translatable. Some _()
> were in the wrong places, there are several cases of sentences being
> constructed from parts, and so on.
>
> If we were to move it to src/bin/ then we would have to talk about
> translatability. Prior to that I would think it's premature. I mean,
> if we don't consider it good enough to be in src/bin/, why waste
> translator time on it?

This was a more general question of why contrib doesn't get _any_
translations.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2012-09-14 14:20:55 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries.
Previous Message Amit kapila 2012-09-14 14:04:51 Re: Minor inheritance/check bug: Inconsistent behavior