Re: remove dead ports?

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: remove dead ports?
Date: 2012-09-13 16:06:28
Message-ID: 20120913160628.GA20645@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 02:29:08PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I think we need an in-between status of
> might-work-will-remove-if-it-doesnt. The key is not whether to remove
> it, the key is whether the lack of support for certain features in an
> old OS is sufficient to prevent forward progress of PostgreSQL.
>
> IMHO, IRIX no longer rates extra effort, should it be required.

+1 for that.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2012-09-13 17:20:40 Re: WIP patch: add (PRE|POST)PROCESSOR options to COPY
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-09-13 14:32:54 Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables