Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows
Date: 2012-09-04 13:47:49
Message-ID: 20120904134749.GA19036@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:44:09PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> The attached very small patch allows pg_upgrade's "make check" to
> succeed on REL9_2_STABLE on my Mingw system.
>
> However, I consider the issue I mentioned earlier regarding use of
> forward slashes in the argument to rmdir to be a significant
> blocker, so I'm going to go and fix that and then pull this all
> together.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew

> diff --git a/contrib/pg_upgrade/exec.c b/contrib/pg_upgrade/exec.c
> index 6f993df..57ca1df 100644
> --- a/contrib/pg_upgrade/exec.c
> +++ b/contrib/pg_upgrade/exec.c
> @@ -91,10 +91,12 @@ exec_prog(bool throw_error, bool is_priv, const char *log_file,
> else
> retval = 0;
>
> +#ifndef WIN32
> if ((log = fopen_priv(log_file, "a+")) == NULL)
> pg_log(PG_FATAL, "cannot write to log file %s\n", log_file);
> fprintf(log, "\n\n");
> fclose(log);
> +#endif
>
> return retval;
> }

I am confused by this fix. If pg_ctl was keeping that log file open,
wouldn't the log write fail when pg_dump or psql was run later? I am
trying to understand how a later commands would not also trigger an
error. Is it a timing thing? If that is it, I would like to know and
have that documented.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-09-04 13:51:44 Re: pg_dump incorrect output in plaintext mode
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2012-09-04 13:45:22 Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree