Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Date: 2012-08-04 14:36:21
Message-ID: 20120804143621.GC29773@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 05:21:06PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 04.08.2012 11:01, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >Missed one point which needs to be handled is pg_upgrade
>
> I don't think there's anything to do for pg_upgrade. This doesn't
> change the on-disk data format, just the WAL format, and pg_upgrade
> isn't sensitive to WAL format changes.

Correct.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-08-04 16:11:56 Re: Issue in Behavior of Interval Datatype
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-08-04 14:35:49 Re: Word-smithing doc changes