Re: Btree or not btree? That is the question

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)endpoint(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Btree or not btree? That is the question
Date: 2012-07-10 17:35:28
Message-ID: 20120710173528.GC10995@tinybird.home
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:02:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> ... Could you crank up the log verbosity so we can get
> file and line number, at least?

Here is what the increased verbosity reveals in aggregate. This
is about an 18-hour span, covering 12.5M transactions, on
version 8.3.18:

(13 times) Various OIDs that do exist cannot be found:
ERROR: XX000: could not open relation with OID 1554847444
LOCATION: relation_open, heapam.c:879

(21 times) Relations that do exist cannot be found:
ERROR: 42P01: relation "foobar" does not exist
LOCATION: RangeVarGetRelid, namespace.c:273

(1 time) Qualified relation that exists cannot be found:
ERROR: 42P01: relation "public.foobar" does not exist
LOCATION: RangeVarGetRelid, namespace.c:268

(5 times) Failure to read a block:
XX001: could not read block 3 of relation 1663/1554846571/4184054438: read only 0 of 8192 bytes
LOCATION: mdread, md.c:631

(5 times) Cache lookup failure:
XX000: cache lookup failed for relation 1554847255
LOCATION: has_subclass, plancat.c:921

--
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)endpoint(dot)com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Björn Häuser 2012-07-10 18:10:06 Re: [PATCH] psql \n shortcut for set search_path =
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-07-10 17:27:27 Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers