Re: Draft release notes complete

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft release notes complete
Date: 2012-05-10 17:21:07
Message-ID: 20120510172107.GX16881@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 09:55:37AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 5/10/12 9:44 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On tor, 2012-05-10 at 10:44 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> The big take-away is that the release notes are mostly for blame and
> >> to designate a go-to person for feature problems, not for giving
> >> credit,
> >
> > Then reviewers should be removed.
>
> I disagree. We're trying to get more reviewers, and encourage them to
> do more reviewing. Giving credit is a big part of that.

OK, we are officially now "all over the map" on this! I did favor
reviewers over committers for the purpose of encouragement. I am fine
with anything that has the same or fewer names than we have now. I
don't think anyone is arguing for more names, so at least we have a
direction.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-05-10 17:29:30 Re: Draft release notes complete
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-05-10 17:16:13 Re: Draft release notes complete