Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date: 2012-05-10 03:15:13
Message-ID: 20120510031513.GG16881@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:07:52PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> I'll point out that this patch got sandbagged to death, and never made
> it into 9.2. So, for 9.2 replication is just as hard to configure and
> manage as it was in 9.1. Are we going to fix it in 9.3, or not?

Greg Smith was going to allow for files in configuration directories,
and that was somehow going to make it easier to manage the configuration
files and remove recovery.conf. I don't think Greg did it; I didn't
see it in the release notes I just wrote.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2012-05-10 04:31:13 Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-05-10 03:11:02 Draft release notes complete