Re: Last gasp

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Last gasp
Date: 2012-04-11 01:32:05
Message-ID: 201204110332.05789.andres@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 03:14:41 AM Robert Haas wrote:
> > I'm somewhat oddly pleased at how the overflow of incoming submissions
> > for 9.2 has raised questions around not having enough active committers.
> > I hope decisions about adding more recognizes that distributing that
> > power really does influence the ability of people to contribute, on
> > average in a positive way. All I see coming for next year is a dramatic
> > increase in this class of problem.
>
> My perception of what's going on here is dramatically different from
> yours. I don't think there was any overflow of submissions for 9.2.
> For the most part I would describe it as a slow and boring release
> cycle, with the usual spike in half-baked submissions right near the
> end, except this release they were less baked than usual, which is why
> most of them didn't go in.
They might have been half-baked. But several of those didn't get design-level
review for several weeks which makes it rather hard to fully bake them in
time...

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2012-04-11 01:33:35 Re: Last gasp
Previous Message Greg Smith 2012-04-11 01:30:20 Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results