| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt |
| Date: | 2012-03-16 18:22:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20120316182205.GC28340@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:08:07AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:46:24PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >> > I agree with you that some worst case performance tests should be
> >> > done. Could you please say what you think the worst cases would be, so
> >> > those can be tested? That would avoid wasting time or getting anything
> >> > backwards.
> >>
> >> I've thought about this some and here's what I've come up with so far:
> >
> > I question whether we are in a position to do the testing necessary to
> > commit this for 9.2.
>
> Is anyone even working on testing it?
No one I know of. I am just trying to set expectations that this still
has a long way to go.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-03-16 18:25:56 | Incorrect assumptions with low LIMITs |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-03-16 18:15:11 | Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt |