Re: Setting -Werror in CFLAGS

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Setting -Werror in CFLAGS
Date: 2012-02-07 17:51:45
Message-ID: 20120207175145.GM19450@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:44:07PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >>> Yes, I know that these only appeared in GCC 4.6+ and as such are a
> >>> relatively recent phenomenon, but there has been some effort to
> >>> eliminate them, and if I could get a non-hacked -Werror build I'd feel
> >>> happy enough about excluding them as already outlined.
> >
> >> I just do this:
> >> echo COPT=-Werror > src/Makefile.custom
> >> ...which seems to work reasonably well.
> >
> > I see no point in -Werror whatsoever.  If you aren't examining the make
> > output for warnings, you're not following proper development practice
> > IMO.
>
> I find -Werror to be a convenient way to examine the output for
> warnings. Otherwise they scroll off the screen. Yeah, I could save
> the output to a file and grep it afterwards, but that seems less
> convenient.

Our src/tools/pgtest does this:

http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/tools/pgtest;hb=HEAD

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jay Levitt 2012-02-07 19:26:20 Bugs/slowness inserting and indexing cubes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-02-07 17:47:52 Re: When do we lose column names?