| From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |
| Date: | 2012-01-25 16:08:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20120125160837.GA5757@depesz.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 08:06:42AM -0800, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> And therein lies the problem:) Per Toms comment, extract sees these timestamps
> without timezones and assumes they are local time and rotates them back to UTC.
i know about it.
but - given the fact that date_part(, timestamp) is marked as immutable,
it seems to be that it's a bug.
Best regards,
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-01-25 16:10:19 | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-01-25 16:06:42 | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-01-25 16:10:19 | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-01-25 16:06:42 | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |