| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Show sequences owned by |
| Date: | 2011-11-04 14:29:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20111104142936.GH24234@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> If there is noone owning it at all, it just falls through the if/else
> block and ignores it if that happens (PQntuples() returns 0).
Ah, right, but 'result' is still non-zero, ok.
> Is there really a case for multiple sequences to own it? How would you
> go about making that happen? ALTER SEQUENCE.. OWNED BY.. only takes
> one table, afaics?
I just noticed it was pulling from pg_depend and we could be creating
multiple dependencies on a single sequence by having two tables use it
as a default value. If that situation doesn't cause a problem for this,
then that's fine. :) Couldn't remember if we distinguished 'owned by'
from 'dependend upon' for seqeunces.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-04 14:34:46 | Re: IDLE in transaction introspection |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-11-04 14:28:23 | Re: removing =>(text, text) in 9.2 |