From: | "ktm(at)rice(dot)edu" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure *EXTERN* <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas *EXTERN* <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SSL encryption makes bytea transfer slow |
Date: | 2011-11-03 15:01:53 |
Message-ID: | 20111103150153.GD10975@staff-mud-56-27.rice.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 03:48:11PM +0100, Albe Laurenz wrote:
>
> I experimented some more on a recent system (RHEL6, OpenSSL 1.0.0-fips),
> and it is as you say. Disabling OpenSSL compression in the source (which
> is possible since OpenSSL 1.0.0) does not give me any performance
> improvement.
>
> Seems you pretty much have to live with at most 1/4 of the performance
> if you want to SELECT large images using SSL.
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>
Have you tried different ciphers? RC4 is much lighter weight CPU-wise
then the typically negotiated cipher. AES128 is also not bad if you
have the newer Intel chips with the hardware encryption support. Just
another thing to check.
Regards,
Ken
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mario Weilguni | 2011-11-03 15:02:07 | Re: Performance Problem with postgresql 9.03, 8GB RAM,Quadcore Processor Server--Need help!!!!!!! |
Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2011-11-03 14:48:11 | Re: SSL encryption makes bytea transfer slow |