Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table;

From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
To: Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table;
Date: 2011-11-03 14:21:42
Message-ID: 20111103142141.GA21264@depesz.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 03:19:36PM +0100, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> On 3 November 2011 15:15, hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Do the xobject_id values have other negative numbers or is -1 just a special
> >> case? The only thing I can think of is a corrupted index on xobject_id.
> >
> > minimal xobject_id in source table is 1000.
> >
> > index on xobject_id might be corrupted, but it doesn't explain that I
> > don't see duplicates with group_by/having query on xobjects, which uses
> > seqscan:
>
> Actually, it does. A sequential scan doesn't use the index.

sure. but so isn't create table as.

Best regards,

depesz

--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2011-11-03 14:30:27 Re: Memory Issue
Previous Message Alban Hertroys 2011-11-03 14:19:36 Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table;

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-11-03 14:22:48 Re: heap vacuum & cleanup locks
Previous Message Alban Hertroys 2011-11-03 14:19:36 Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table;