Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Mr(dot) Aaron W(dot) Swenson" <titanofold(at)gentoo(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
Date: 2011-10-03 18:15:47
Message-ID: 201110031815.p93IFlm28727@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 10/03/2011 12:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > I was never exactly thrilled with the separate-config-directory design
> > to start with, so I'm probably not the person to opine on whether we
> > could get away with removing it.
> >
> >
>
> The horse has well and truly bolted. We'd have a major row if anyone
> tried to remove it. Let's not rehash old battles. Our only option is to
> make it work as best we can.

I disagree. If people were using it we would have had many more bug
reports about pg_ctl not working.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-10-03 18:19:17 Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-10-03 18:14:44 Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories