Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained
Date: 2011-07-11 23:59:01
Message-ID: 201107112359.p6BNx1B17817@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 06/28/2011 05:31 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On tis, 2011-06-28 at 17:05 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >>> Couldn't you just put a text file on the build farm server with
> >>> recommended branches?
> >> As I told Magnus, that gets ugly because of limitations in MinGW's SDK
> >> perl. I suppose I could just not implement the feature for MinGW, but
> >> I've tried damn hard not to make those sorts of compromises and I'm not
> >> keen to start.
> > The buildfarm code can upload the build result via HTTP; why can't it
> > download a file via HTTP?
>
>
> It has to use a separate script to do that. I don't really want to add
> another one just for this.
>
> (thinks a bit) I suppose I can make it do:
>
> my $url = "http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/branches_of_interest.txt";
> my $branches_of_interest = `perl -MLWP::Simple -e "getprint(q{$url})"`;
>
> Maybe that's the best option. It's certainly going to be less code than
> anything else :-)

Could you pull the list of active branches from our web site HTML?
\
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-07-12 00:10:42 Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-07-11 22:58:35 TODO list updated