Re: How did I get 8 Exclusive locks on the same table? And how many locks is too many?

From: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
To: Aleksey Tsalolikhin <atsaloli(dot)tech(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How did I get 8 Exclusive locks on the same table? And how many locks is too many?
Date: 2011-06-29 20:39:18
Message-ID: 20110629163918.34da417b.wmoran@potentialtech.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

In response to Aleksey Tsalolikhin <atsaloli(dot)tech(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
> We use the fine Bucardo check_postgres Nagios plugin,
> and it reported a "CRITICAL" level spike in database locks
> (171 locks).
>
> I looked closely at my database logs and found an even bigger spike
> just a few minutes earlier (208 locks).
>
> I saw 8 EXCLUSIVE locks on table X. All of these queries completed
> within 5 seconds. (I know that because they do not appear in my
> slow query log.)

What manner did you use to determine this? It's not possible to have
multiple table-level EXCLUSIVE locks on a single table, since a single
table level EXCLUSIVE lock will cause other lock attempts to block.
However, it's possible to have multiple row-level EXCLUSIVE locks, 1
per row. Did the mysterious magic that you used to determine that
there were 8 EXCLUSIVE locks tell you whether they were table level
or row level? If they're table level, then something is wrong either
with PostgreSQL or your magic. If they're row level, then that's
hardly unusual.

--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jasmin Dizdarevic 2011-06-29 20:45:20 Re: FOREIGN TABLE with dblink
Previous Message Aleksey Tsalolikhin 2011-06-29 19:53:45 How did I get 8 Exclusive locks on the same table? And how many locks is too many?