From: | Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)" <bnicholson(at)hp(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 or 9.1 ? |
Date: | 2011-06-17 05:43:29 |
Message-ID: | 201106170843.29889.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanx brad,
i think 9.0 would be the most wise decision for the time being.
Στις Thursday 16 June 2011 18:29:16 γράψατε:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-general-
> > owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
> > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:05 AM
> > To: Achilleas Mantzios
> > Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 9.0 or 9.1 ?
> >
> > It could be worth considering 9.1. Probably by the time you get
> > production ready version, 9.1 will be already stable (few months I
> > guess).
> > The usual answer to that question is - it will be ready when its ready.
> >
>
> I would also ask, what is your (and your managements) tolerance for risk, and do you actually need any of the new features and/or performance benefits in 9.1?
>
> Postgres does have an excellent track record for quality and stability with new releases, but a couple of months in the field isn't really considered stable in most places.
>
> Brad.
>
--
Achilleas Mantzios
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alban Hertroys | 2011-06-17 06:42:59 | Re: Constraint to ensure value does NOT exist in another table? |
Previous Message | Achilleas Mantzios | 2011-06-17 05:42:14 | Re: Fw: PostgreSQL 9.0 or 9.1 ? |