Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >>>> Perhaps we should allow any SVG file to be imported, but only allow
> >>>> modifications by a single SVG editor.
> >
> >>> How is that sensible? ?The first change to the file will result in
> >>> exactly the mass of cosmetic diffs that we wish to avoid.
> >
> >> I suggested this so we could get images into the docs and then only have
> >> a single diff change once the file is modified. ?If we don't do that
> >> then all image additions have to be done by someone with the proper
> >> editor.
> >
> > Or at least, somebody passes it through the "proper editor" before
> > committing. ?As long as said editor can read SVG output from a
> > reasonable range of other tools, this doesn't seem that onerous.
>
> Bad news, Bruce: you're going to have to learn a new tool. :-)

Yes, I am sensing that. ;-)

Do we have any agreement on which tool will be the definitive one?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +