| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY |
| Date: | 2011-06-13 15:41:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20110613154140.GB28357@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 09:01:45AM +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
> Hm, that's less bulky but more kludgy, I'd say. But wait a minute...
>
> If ANY and ALL are reserved anyway, should it be possible to
> make "(ANY(..) <op> <expr>)" and "(ALL(...) <op> <expr>)"
> work grammar-wise? (Note the enclosing parens)
This would be a very, very useful feature. :)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2011-06-13 15:54:13 | Re: FOREIGN TABLE doc fix |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-06-13 15:41:11 | Re: On-the-fly index tuple deletion vs. hot_standby |