| From: | Leif Biberg Kristensen <leif(at)solumslekt(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 10 missing features |
| Date: | 2011-04-26 12:30:19 |
| Message-ID: | 201104261430.19617.leif@solumslekt.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Monday 25 April 2011 10:41:36 Linos wrote:
> Hi all,
> only want to link this blog post
> http://blog.kimiensoftware.com/2011/04/top-10-missing-postgresql-features ,
> i think he may have any good points.
>
>
> Miguel Angel.
Maybe the best point is the one between the lines: That PostgreSQL is being
compared to Oracle on a feature-by-feature basis. I don't know if his views
are representative for Oracle DBAs, but it's an indication of PostgreSQL being
considered in the same league as Oracle.
The «features» perceived to be missing from PostgreSQL by the Oracle DBA is
the icing on the cake. The cake itself (in terms of data integrity,
performance, scalability) is obviously regarded as totally edible.
regards, Leif
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Phoenix Kiula | 2011-04-26 12:41:19 | Re: Help - corruption issue? |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2011-04-26 12:28:37 | Re: Partitioning an existing table |