| From: | Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Index fillfactor changed in pg9? |
| Date: | 2011-04-01 13:05:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20110401130550.GU26726@aart.is.rice.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 01:46:03PM +0100, Glyn Astill wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> Just testing some new hardware on 9.0.3 and have restored one of our dumps from 8.4.7. What I'm seeing is although table sizes are the same, indexes are a lot bigger, approx 50%.
>
> I've done a search and so far can't find anything, but have default fillfactors changed? Or is it something else?
>
> Thanks
> Glyn
>
Given absolutely zero information, are both platforms the same
number of bits? 32-versus 64-bit? The alignment needs for 64-bit
could result in needing more space. Another alternative is that
the order of data insertion caused a bigger index. What happens
if you run a REINDEX on both DB's to the index sizes?
Regards,
Ken
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Glyn Astill | 2011-04-01 13:17:41 | Re: Index fillfactor changed in pg9? |
| Previous Message | Glyn Astill | 2011-04-01 12:46:03 | Index fillfactor changed in pg9? |