Re: Index fillfactor changed in pg9?

From: Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Index fillfactor changed in pg9?
Date: 2011-04-01 13:05:50
Message-ID: 20110401130550.GU26726@aart.is.rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 01:46:03PM +0100, Glyn Astill wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> Just testing some new hardware on 9.0.3 and have restored one of our dumps from 8.4.7. What I'm seeing is although table sizes are the same, indexes are a lot bigger, approx 50%.
>
> I've done a search and so far can't find anything, but have default fillfactors changed? Or is it something else?
>
> Thanks
> Glyn
>

Given absolutely zero information, are both platforms the same
number of bits? 32-versus 64-bit? The alignment needs for 64-bit
could result in needing more space. Another alternative is that
the order of data insertion caused a bigger index. What happens
if you run a REINDEX on both DB's to the index sizes?

Regards,
Ken

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Glyn Astill 2011-04-01 13:17:41 Re: Index fillfactor changed in pg9?
Previous Message Glyn Astill 2011-04-01 12:46:03 Index fillfactor changed in pg9?