Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC

From: Gianni Ciolli <gianni(dot)ciolli(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC
Date: 2011-03-25 18:09:54
Message-ID: 20110325180954.GA17471@albo.gi.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 08:46:17AM +0000, Gianni Ciolli wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 08:14:21PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > Agreed. The documentation is suggestive of this limit:
> >
> > # CREATE TABLE n (c numeric(1001,0));
> > ERROR: NUMERIC precision 1001 must be between 1 and 1000
> > LINE 1: CREATE TABLE n (c numeric(1001,0));
> >
> > However, that's indeed just a limit of the numeric typmod representation, not
> > the data type itself. An unqualified "numeric" column hits no such limit.
>
> For the record, the limits I found from my tests are:
> * 2^17 - 1 maximum total digits
> * 2^14 - 1 maximum fractional digits
>
> (I did tests as I couldn't extract any obvious limit from the source
> code of numeric.c)

The attached patch resumes this short discussion.

Best regards,
Dr. Gianni Ciolli - 2ndQuadrant Italia
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
gianni(dot)ciolli(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it | www.2ndquadrant.it

Attachment Content-Type Size
patch.diff text/x-diff 1.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-03-25 18:37:19 Re: When and how many times does ExecSetParamPlan executes?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-03-25 18:08:31 Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache