Re: pgindent (was Re: Header comments in the recently added files)

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgindent (was Re: Header comments in the recently added files)
Date: 2011-03-10 15:43:30
Message-ID: 201103101543.p2AFhUq26330@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> > I found trivial mistakes in the recently added files.
> >> > Will they fixed by some automated batches, or by manual?
> >>
> >> > - "Copyright (c) xxx-*2010*, PostgreSQL Global Development Group"
> >> > ? in pg_collation.h, pg_foreign_table.h, basebackup.h, syncrep.h,
> >> > ? pg_backup_directory.c and auth_delay.c.
> >> > - "IDENTIFICATION $PostgreSQL$" in pg_collation.h, syncrep.h, and syncrep.c
> >> > ? Other files has their actual paths in the same place.
> >>
> >> It might be worth Bruce making another run of his copyright-update
> >> script to fix the former problems. ?As for the latter problems,
> >
> > I ran it just now and nothing was changed, so we are OK now.
>
> Speaking of running scripts, I think we should run pgindent now.

We usually do it during a late beta.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-03-10 15:47:58 Re: pgindent (was Re: Header comments in the recently added files)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-03-10 15:43:03 Re: Theory of operation of collation patch