| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)debian(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
| Date: | 2011-02-17 04:48:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20110217044812.GS4116@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Bruce Momjian (bruce(at)momjian(dot)us) wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Probably readline but does it matter? We distribute the source to the
> > click installers.
>
> Well, there is what the community is risking, and there is what the
> packagers are risking. Ideally we would make the job easier for the
> packagers too, though we don't have to.
I'm really mystified by this. If the source is available for the
installers, what's the risk that you're worried about..? For the
community or the packagers?
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jason Earl | 2011-02-17 04:50:21 | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2011-02-17 04:47:30 | Re: WALInsertLock contention |