Re: When will old wal segments get removed?

From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: When will old wal segments get removed?
Date: 2011-02-08 14:24:49
Message-ID: 20110208142449.GA2736@depesz.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 02:21:08PM +0000, Thom Brown wrote:
> > $ ls -l pg_xlog/ | head
> > total 2620721
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres     249 Sep  8 20:14 00000001000003DB0000003E.000061A8.backup
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres 16777216 Feb  8 11:39 000000010000076D000000F7
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres 16777216 Feb  8 11:40 000000010000076D000000F8
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres 16777216 Feb  8 11:40 000000010000076D000000F9
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres 16777216 Feb  8 11:40 000000010000076D000000FA
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres 16777216 Feb  8 11:41 000000010000076D000000FB
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres 16777216 Feb  8 11:42 000000010000076D000000FC
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres 16777216 Feb  8 11:43 000000010000076D000000FD
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres 16777216 Feb  8 11:44 000000010000076D000000FE
> >
> > they are archived:
> > $ ls -l pg_xlog/archive_status/ | head
> > total 179
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres       0 Sep  8 20:14 00000001000003DB0000003E.000061A8.backup.done
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres       0 Feb  8 11:39 000000010000076D000000F7.ready
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres       0 Feb  8 11:40 000000010000076D000000F8.ready
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres       0 Feb  8 11:40 000000010000076D000000F9.ready
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres       0 Feb  8 11:40 000000010000076D000000FA.ready
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres       0 Feb  8 11:41 000000010000076D000000FB.ready
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres       0 Feb  8 11:42 000000010000076D000000FC.ready
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres       0 Feb  8 11:43 000000010000076D000000FD.ready
> > -rw-------   1 postgres postgres       0 Feb  8 11:44 000000010000076D000000FE.ready
>
> Well normally those would get deleted automatically after archiving,
> but since you're suggesting the previous archive_command didn't return
> a zero exit status, that process wouldn't have happened. If you're
> sure those are archived, can't you just go ahead and delete them
> manually?

right now archiving works, and was called for all older wal segments -
so we can see it in archive_status/.

I probably could remove them by hand, but I never feel ok to do stuff
like this manually, and what's more - i'd prefer to understand why these
are not getting removed.

Best regards,

depesz

--
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/depesz / blog: http://www.depesz.com/
jid/gtalk: depesz(at)depesz(dot)com / aim:depeszhdl / skype:depesz_hdl / gg:6749007

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael 2011-02-08 14:30:23 Re: Displaying text appears as hex data
Previous Message Thom Brown 2011-02-08 14:21:08 Re: When will old wal segments get removed?