Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "david(at)lang(dot)hm" <david(at)lang(dot)hm>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date: 2011-02-04 22:58:17
Message-ID: 201102042258.p14MwIV28696@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Greg Smith wrote:
> Check out
> http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=postgres%2C+mysql%2C+oracle&relative=1&relative=1
> if you want to see the real story here. Oracle has a large installed
> base, but it's considered a troublesome legacy product being replaced

+1 for Oracle being a "troublesome legacy product".

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2011-02-04 23:05:23 Re: Linux filesystem performance and checkpoint sorting
Previous Message Thomas Kellerer 2011-02-04 22:53:15 Re: How to extract a value from a record using attnum or attname?

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Browne 2011-02-04 23:15:10 Re: getting the most of out multi-core systems for repeated complex SELECT statements
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2011-02-04 22:57:59 Re: Re: getting the most of out multi-core systems for repeated complex SELECT statements