| From: | Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SSI patch version 12 |
| Date: | 2011-01-18 01:00:28 |
| Message-ID: | 20110118010028.GK87714@csail.mit.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 06:52:09PM -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> I think we still need the vxid. It shows in the pg_locks view, and
> we might possibly need it to find the right process to cancel once we
> have some way to do that. But there's no point with having the tag
> level anymore.
Oh, right, we do use it to generate pg_lock_status. I forgot about that
particular tendril of code that extends outside of predicate.c.
> Dan, if you're not already working on these, I'll take them, so you
> can focus on 2PC.
All yours! But if you feel like renaming SerializableXactHashLock,
please hold off to prevent conflicts with my 2PC changes.
Dan
--
Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL http://drkp.net/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-01-18 01:20:20 | Re: SSI patch version 12 |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2011-01-18 00:56:35 | Re: estimating # of distinct values |